Welcome To The
Aquaculture & Fisheries Page

Please note that the links in the top horizontal navigation bar will change as you navigate through the various sections on the left-hand menu.

Aquaculture/Fisheries Center Research Highlights
Catfish
  1. Productive Efficiency of Catfish Farms in Chicot County, Arkansas
    Aloyce R. Kaliba and Carole R.Engle

    Technical, allocative, and cost efficiency measures of a sample of small and medium sized catfish farms in Chicot County, Arkansas were estimated using a weight-restricted data envelopment analysis technique. A measure of cost efficiency is used to determine operator characteristics, farm practices, and institutional support services that are likely to lead to higher levels of efficiency. Experience of the operators and extension contacts were important factors positively influencing farm level efficiency. Extension services in Chicot County generated about $5.2 million in cost savings among catfish farms or about $2,737 per contact. Importantly, higher cost efficiency of catfish farm efficiency in Chicot County, Arkansas, can be achieved by adjusting inputs used in production to optimal levels rather than by adjusting the scale of operation.
     
  2. An Evaluation of the Potential Market for and Uses of Catfish Processing Waste
    Aloyce R. Kaliba and Carole R. Engle

    Processing of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) to produce sellable products yields substantial quantities of unutilized processing waste. Depending on the product forms dictated by the marketing strategy of the processor, up to 47% of the fish weight is usually discarded as waste. Utilization of by-products from catfish processing is increasingly becoming important because the quantity of processed fish (a more than 13-fold increase in 24 years) has also increased the quantity of waste to be disposed and there is increased knowledge on the benefits of utilizing these wastes for different uses. In this study, an attempt is made to compile and discuss potential value-added products that can be produced from catfish processing wastes. The focus is on documenting current application and use, identifying available technologies to manufacture the products, and identifying existing and potential markets for these products.
     
  3. The Effect of Understocking Density of Channel Catfish Stockers in Multiple-Batch Production
    Brent Southworth and Carole Engle

    A multiple-batch study was conducted using stocker catfish (0.20 lb/fish) and carryover fish (0.86 lb/fish) to look at the effects of different densities of stockers on overall fish production. Twelve 0.25-acre ponds were stocked with 3,000; 4,500; or 6,000 stockers/acre, and 2,000 lb/ac carryover fish. Partial harvest one removed 1,500 lb/ac and partial harvest two removed 1,000 lb/ac. Survival of both size classes of fish was relatively high and not significantly different (P > 0.05) due to stocking density. Survivals were 78-88% for stockers and 92-97% for carryover fish. Although there appeared to be a trend of increasing yield with increasing density, no significant differences were detected for gross, net, and net daily yields. Marketable yields (> 1.25 lb) were not affected by density. However, sub-marketable yield (< 1.25 lb) increased as stocking density increased. The last seven weeks of culture, there was a trend of declining carryover growth at the high stocking densities, however no significant differences were measured (p = 0.08). Carryover fish at low density had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) mean weight at harvest, while there were no significant differences in average stocker weight at any sampling period. This study found that it is possible that stockers have higher survival, reach market size faster, and may compete with carryover fish better than smaller fingerlings when stocked in multiple-batch.
     
  4. The effect of pond water depth on channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) production
    Adam Nanninga

    Older catfish ponds tend to become more shallow over time if not re-worked periodically. Anecdotal information suggests that shallow ponds may result in lower yields. A replicated pond study was designed to compare the effect of two pond water depths on growth, yield, feed conversion ratio, and cost of producing channel catfish in multiple-batch production. Eight 0.04-ha ponds were used. Four ponds had standpipes cut to allow a maximum depth of 153 cm, and four had standpipes cut to allow for a maximum depth of only 91 cm. Deep ponds had 1.74 times the water volume of the shallow ponds. Ponds were stocked 16 March 2005 with 1,680 kg/ha of carryover fish (480 g) and 15,000 fingerlings/ha of fingerling catfish (25.4 g) were stocked into each pond. Fish were fed to satiation daily using a 32% protein pellet floating catfish feed. TAN and nitrite was measured monthly and chlorophyll a was checked every 2 weeks. Ponds were seined monthly during the growing season. Group weights of at least 45.35 kg of carryover fish, and 200 fingerlings were sampled per pond to estimate average weights of fingerling and carryover fish on each sampling date. On October 5, 2005 all ponds were harvested and group weights of all remaining fish were performed. No significant difference was found in FCR, gross yield, net yield, survival, or growth between treatments. Water quality was similar between treatments.
     
 
UAPB Seal